St. Johns Bridge, 1937

The heavy cruiser USS Portland (CA-33) travels under the St. Johns Bridge in this 1937 photo. The ship, named for Portland, Maine, is heading upriver with the St. Johns neighborhood seen across the Willamette and the Portland Woolen Mills seen below the bridge.

A2004-002.2773 St Johns Bridge looking east 1937(City of Portland Archives)

Tags: , ,

14 Responses to “St. Johns Bridge, 1937”

  1. sharon dunnahoo Says:

    Wow, great shot!

  2. Dave Brunker (@dbrunker) Says:

    Looks like it was partly sunny/partly foggy that day. I’ll bet if you searched through maritime records you could find out exactly what day this picture was taken on.

  3. Lefty Says:

    That IS a great and perfectly timed shot! Thanks for posting this!

    Photogrpahers Cross and Dimmitt were better known for postcard prints and landscape photos of the Columbia River Gorge, but did work all over Oregon.

    “Arthur B. Cross partnered with Edward L. Dimmitt to sell real photo post cards of the Columbia River Gorge, Mt. Hood and Portland. Cross opened his Electric Studio in Portland in 1909. Dimmitt was born in 1881 in Columbia, Missouri. In 1909, Dimmitt was first listed in the Portland City Directory as a waiter. In 1914, he began working for Cross at the Electric Studio. In 1916, they became partners and named their business Cross & Dimmitt.

    Cross & Dimmitt sold post cards off the running boards of their Model T at Crown Point. A set of 20 views, which are fairly common today, sold for $1. Their business grew and they built a post card stand at Crown Point. In the 1920s, they set up a studio at 72nd and Sandy Boulevard in Portland. Cross died August 6, 1940 and Dimmitt died on April 26, 1963 at the age of 82. He had managed the Vista House for 40 years.”

    Info above from:

    http://columbiariverhighway.com/coppermine/index.php?cat=2

    which also has a selection of other C&D images…

  4. Brian Says:

    @ Dave Brunker: It was very likely July 16, 1937. On this website you can find a photo of the USS Astoria (CA-34) also passing under the St. John’s bridge with the caption:

    “USS ASTORIA CA-34 steams under the St. Johns Bridge spanning the Willamette River, 16 July 1937″

    And the the preceding paragraph:

    “In July 1937, ASTORIA was one of 18 U.S. Navy ships that participated in the Pacific Fleet Fiesta as part of the annual Portland Rose Festival. This large naval presence sailed up the Columbia and Willamette Rivers into Portland, Oregon beginning 16 July.”

  5. Brian Says:

    Re the date: I wondered about it being in July given that the Rose Festival is in June, but here’s a post card from the USS Tuscaloosa (CA-37) with a cancellation from Portland Fleet Week dated July 18, 1937.

  6. Brian Says:

    Also, in the first link I posted above, if you scroll down there are several other photos fleet week in Portland in 1937. Most are of the Astoria but you can also see the USS Northampton and the USS Indianapolis — all three of which would be lost in WWII (most famously, of course, the Indianapolis, sister ship of the USS Portland in today’s post).

  7. Lefty Says:

    Looks like conditions on the East Bank are different though? Not just the moored ships, but the building on pilings at the foot of the street just south of the bridge abutment looks like it is only framing in the Astoria pic, but finished in the Portland pic? And despite the fact that these pictures were clearly taken from the same place, there is a dead branch entering into the right side of in the Portland pic, which is missing in the Astoria pic.

    When you click on the Astoria pic to embiggenate it, is the dark spot on the southern cable of the St John’s bridge a bridgeworker?

  8. Brian Says:

    @Lefty: Yes, I think you’re right. I’m at work and didn’t have time to look too closely earlier, but now I see a couple differences that would seem to indicate a different date.

  9. Isaac Rabinovitch Says:

    Great photo.

    Note that the ship was named after the city in Maine. This kind of large, all gun warship was already obsolete, but it took a war with Japan where naval action was dominated by carriers to make that clear.

  10. Karen Says:

    Obsolete in that they did not have primarily antiaircraft guns.
    Iowa Class ships built during WWII were intended to protect the aircraft carriers by their dozens of antiaircraft guns.
    Of course their 9 BIG guns helped destroy the enemy beaches to allow the Marines landing.

  11. Lefty Says:

    A little more sleuthing around in the Oregonian archive reveals the USS Portland was invited to Portland OR for Navy Day Oct 27th 1933. Page 8 of the Oct 27 Oregonian shows a picture looking down onto the front of the ship taken “by a staff photographer looking down from the St. John’s Bridge”.

    Improbably, it is possible to see that the groups of seamen standing on the bow deck are in the exact same positions visible in the C&D photo, which was probably taken 20-30 seconds later … including a guy standing on the cross beam of the rigging above the ship’s bridge that I had not even seen in the C&D photo until I specifically looked for him.

    So, I’m gonna say that the date of that photo is Oct 26, 1933.

    I think this is an open link?:

    http://0-docs.newsbank.com.catalog.multcolib.org/openurl?ctx_ver=z39.88-2004&rft_id=info:sid/iw.newsbank.com:EANX-NB&rft_val_format=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rft_dat=12A343F3A39EB615&svc_dat=HistArchive:ahnpdoc&req_dat=0D10F2CADB4B24C0

  12. Lefty Says:

    looks like it is not an open link, sorry.

  13. Brian Says:

    @Lefty: Nice find. Here’s a USS Portland postal cancellationM from Oct. 26 1933 in Portland. Looks like it was taking part in the Battleship Oregon 40th anniversary.

    Also, given the photo looking down on the ship, that adds to my wondering if the guy on the cable you asked about in the USS Astoria photo was perhaps a photographer looking to get a unique shot of the ship passing underneath (maybe he remembered the 1933 Oregonian photo and thought I can do better! :) )

  14. Isaac Rabinovitch Says:

    I had thought that the old black shoe navy versus brown shoe navy debate was settled a long time ago. In any case, my apologies for restarting it here.

    Is it a trick of perspective, or are they going to have to lower that mast to get under the bridge?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,389 other followers

%d bloggers like this: